A world-renowned leader and pioneer in the field of integrative medicine.
Read MoreA world-renowned leader and pioneer in the field of integrative medicine.
Read MoreChoose between 7 pre-conferences on
Tuesday May 18th, 2010
08:30 - 17:00
Jump to:
Title: Evaluating complex complementary and alternative treatments: building programme theory models to link intervention, context and outcomes
Conveners and speakers: Charlotte Paterson, Heather Boon, Lasse Skovgaard.
One of the major challenges in evaluating complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is the complexity in the courses of disease and treatment. It has been argued that the core question “what works?” should be rephrased in an extended form, “what works, for whom, when, where, and why, and from whose perspectives”? Programme theory (intervention theory, logic modeling) conceptualises outcome as linked to both mechanism and context. Used as a basis for constructing conceptual models of complex health care interventions, programme theory ensures that such models include not only the intervention and the outcomes but also explicitly represents the components and dynamic of the process and the social and cultural contexts.
The purpose of the workshop is to enhance the capability of the participants to use programme theory, and other types of conceptual modeling, in their research, evaluation and practice. It is suitable for those with and without some experience of developing conceptual models. This participative workshop will include an introduction to the subject, some examples of developing such models in CAM research and structured small group activities to try out the ideas in practice.
Several brief presentation slots are available for participants to present their own work in this area. To discuss this, or for further details of the programme, please contact charlotte.paterson@pms.ac.uk.
Title: Research issues specific for CAM/IM in children
Preliminary PedCAM Workshop Day May 18, Tromsø, Norway
| Time | Activity | Location |
| 8:00 – 9:00 | Registration |
|
| 9:00 – 9:15 | Welcome Sunita Vohra, Canada; Shay Pintov, Israel |
|
| 9:15-10:15 | Keynote: Advancing from CAM to Integrative Pediatrics – Research Barriers and Opportunities Kathi Kemper, USA |
|
| 10:15-10:30 | Break |
|
| 10:30 – 12:00 | Concurrent workshops |
|
| National Institutes of Health funding W Weber, USA
|
|
|
| Hypnotherapy for childhood conditions: An evidence based approach AN Webb, Australia; K Sevar, Australia; AG Catto-Smith, Australia
|
|
|
| Acupuncture in children S Pintov, Israel
|
|
|
| 12:00 – 13:00 | Lunch
|
|
| 13:00 - 14:30 | Concurrent workshops
|
|
| Conducting studies in children, (invited) W Weber, USA |
|
|
| TBA |
|
|
| Mindfulness and mind-body skills with children Nimrod Sheinman, Israel |
|
|
| 14:30 – 15:00 | Break |
|
| 15:00 – 16:30 | Concurrent workshops
|
|
| Natural Health Products safety (invited) P Gardiner, USA; S Vohra, Canada; D Adams, Canada
|
|
|
| Integrative pediatrics patient care models the Dutch experience I.A. von Rosenstiel, the Netherlands; A. Vlieger, the Netherlands
|
|
|
| Moving toward integrative health care: Children’s families’ and health providers’ roles for improved communicaton, knowledge exchange and patient-centered care K Toupin April, Canada; I Gaboury, Canada |
|
|
| 16:30 – 17:00 | Concluding remarks, invitation to 2011/2012 events Sunita Vohra |
|
Title: Developing best practice in traditional Chinese medicine
Presenters: George Lewith, Andrew Flower, Jianping Liu, Terje Alreak
Chair persons: George Lewith, Jianping Liu, Andrew Flower
In this workshop, we will discuss the concept of ‘best practice’, and how we can develop best practice in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). A questioning approach in clinical practice will be developed in cooperation with implementing systematic review findings, clinical trials, and a Delphi process to develop best practice for clinical trials, an evolutionary process within clinical practice, as well as improving the practice of Chinese herbal medicine. Four international speakers will present the advantages and disadvantages of the Cochrane systematic review process, the pragmatic development of clinical practice in primary care, and developing, evolving and continuing to audit best practice guidelines, respectively, and various issues related to best practice in TCM will be discussed.
Presentation topics:
| Time | Activity |
| 10:00-10:30 | Registration |
| 10:30-10:40 | General introduction of best practice guideline George Lewith |
| 10:40-11:20 | The advantages and disadvantages of the Cochrane process Andrew Flower, Jianping Liu |
| 11:20-12:00 | Developing best practice guidelines-combining Delphi with a systematic review: an example of Chinese herbal medicine for endometriosis Andrew Flower, George Lewith |
| 12:00-13:00 | Lunch |
| 13:00-13:20 | Developing best practice in acupuncture using Delphi approach: example of acupuncture treatment for hot-flashes in postmenopausal women Terje Alreak |
| 13:20-13:50 | Group task: Group 1: development of best practice guideline of acupuncture for back pain Group 2: development of best practice guideline of Chinese herbal medicine for irritable bowel syndrome George Lewith |
| 13:50-14:30 | Discussions and summary of the workshop |
Title: Closing the gap between consumers, clinicians and researchers in Complementary Therapies and Integrative Medicine
Presenters:
This workshop addresses gaps among consumers, clinicians, and researchers within complementary therapies and integrative medicine (CT/IM) through (1) the presentation of research that documents the causes of differences, and (2) the review of programs implemented to reduce differences and increase collaboration. Learning objectives for this workshop are that participants will be able to articulate specific factors that separate consumers, clinicians, and researchers within CT/IM; define characteristics of successful programs that have brought together consumers, clinicians, and researchers within CT/IM; and design processes that will close gaps among consumers, clinicians, and researchers within CT/IM. The workshop will include six presentations addressing patient-physician communication about CT/IM; gaps in understanding the efficacy of CT/IM; legal and regulatory issues when developing an integrative medicine program; community-based participatory approaches to closing gaps in CT/IM; and Therapeutic Touch and Guided Imagery in the Netherlands and Tai Chi in the United States as examples of CT/IM used to close gaps between consumers, clinicians, and researchers. Each presentation will include an overview statement by the moderator, facilitated breakout groups on strategies for “closing the gap”, and report/discussion by the breakout groups.
Presentation topics:
| Time | Activity |
| 8:45 am | Introduction |
| 9:00am – noon | Barriers to Communication |
| 9:00 am | Doctor-Patient Communication about Complementary Therapies and Integrative Medicine: Why don’t conventional doctors and patients discuss the use of complementary therapies and integrative medicine? (Arcury) |
| 10:00 am | The Efficacy of Complementary Therapies and Integrative Medicine: Gaps between Researchers, Clinicians, and Consumer (Witt) |
| 11:00 am | Closing the Gap between Compliance and Practice: How to Avoid Legal and Regulatory Issues When Developing an Integrative Medicine Program (Graham) |
| Noon | Lunch |
| 1:30 – 5:00 pm | Pathways to Communication |
| 1:30 pm | Using a Community-Based Participatory Approach to Close the Communication Gap between Conventional and Integrative Health Care Providers: The CAM Community-Medical School Planning Committee of Wake Forest University School of Medicine (Arcury & Graham) |
| 2:30 pm | Therapeutic Touch and Guided Imagery in the Netherlands: A Successful Program for Providing Complementary Therapies and Integrative Medicine (Busch) |
| 3:30 | Using Tai Chi to Close the Gap between Conventional Medicine and Complementary Therapies (Graham) |
| 4:30 | Lessons Learned and Recommendations for Improving Collaboration among Consumers, Clinicians, and Researchers |
Title: Japanese Kampo Medicine from an International Perspective: Challenges of Research and Clinical Practice
Workshop organizer: H. Reissenweber, University of Munich, Germany
Presenters:
| K. Watanabe, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan |
| S. Cameron, University of Goettingen, Germany |
| T. Sakiyama, St Marianna University, Kawasaki, Japan |
| T. Oikawa, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan |
| A. Bradford, Westminster University, London, United Kingdom |
| T. Ishikawa, Ishikawa Clinic, Tokyo, Japan |
| H. Reissenweber, University of Munich, Germany |
| U. Eberhard, Kampo Clinic, Madrid, Spain |
| C. Witt, Charité University Medical Center Berlin, Germany |
| T. Sakiyama, The Japan Society for Oriental Medicine, Tokyo, Japan |
| K. Matsuura, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan |
| P. Gao, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan |
| G. De Soriano, Oxford University, United Kingdom |
Time: 10-17
This first international workshop on Japanese Kampo Medicine gives the opportunity to get an overview and to discuss research and clinical practice of Kampo. With its roots in ancient Chinese medicine, Kampo Medicine obtained unique features in Japan. As most complex traditional medical systems, Japanese Kampo Medicine today stands in the center of a conflict to preserve its traditional heritage on the one hand and to become an accepted and integrative part of modern medicine on the other hand. After introducing and defining the special features of Japanese Kampo medicine we will address in three sessions the following aspects: 1. Aspects of preclinical and clinical pharmacological research, 2. Current evidence on clinical research and its methodology, 3. International aspects of Kampo Medicine. The workshop will include thirteen presentations and will give room for discussions. We brought together experienced researchers and clinicians from Japan and different Western countries in the field of Kampo Medicine. The goal of the workshop is to find out the core issues for future research and collaboration within an international context. The workshop will be followed by the General Meeting of the newly founded International Society for Japanese Kampo Medicine (ISJKM).
| 10.00-10.10 | Introduction: Welcome, workshop goals and organization H. Reissenweber, Munich, Germany |
| 10.10-10.25 | The special features of Japanese Kampo medicine K. Watanabe, Tokyo, Japan |
| Aspects of preclinical and clinical pharmacological research: |
|
| 10.25-10.40 | Maintaining the redox-balance intakt: Treatment with Gosha-jinki- gan prevents oxidative stress reactions and induces soluble guanylate cyclase activation in rat diabetic retinopathy S. Cameron, Goettingen, Germany |
| 10.40-10.55 | Effects of Japanese Kampo medicines on histopathological findings in diabetic animal models T. Sakiyama, Kawasaki, Japan |
| 10.55-11.10 | Efficacy of Hange-koboku-to on patients with functional dyspepsia with special reference to gastrointestinal function T. Oikawa, Tokyo, Japan |
| 11.10-11.45 | Panel discussion Session A |
Lunch break
Current evidence on clinical research and its methodology:
| 13.00-13.15 | A reflection on the place of a Kampo practitioner in an action research project team – the Westminster University Menopause study A. Bradford, London, United Kingdom |
| 13.15-13.30 | Efficacy of ethical Japanese Kampo extracts on influenza infection T. Ishikawa, Tokyo, Japan |
| 13.30-13.45 | Comparison of Rikkunshi-to and Koso-san for patients with functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome H. Reissenweber, Munich, Germany |
| 13.45-14.00 | Effectiveness of Kampo medicine in Western Countries: two case reports U. Eberhard, Madrid, Spain |
| 14.00-14.15 | Evaluating the efficacy and effectiveness of Kampo – methodological considerations C. Witt, Berlin, Germany |
| 14.15-14.45 | Panel discussion Session B |
Coffee Break
International aspects of Kampo Medicine:
| 15.15-15.30 | Japanese Kampo Medicine within the Health Care System of Japan: the role of the Japan Society for Oriental Medicine T. Sakiyama for the Japan Society for Oriental Medicine, Tokyo, Japan |
| 15.30-15.45 | A patient-oriented evaluation system for Kampo Medicine by using a new medical interviewing system K. Matsuura, Tokyo, Japan |
| 15.45-16.00 | Comparison of the educational systems for traditional medicine in Japan and China P. Gao, Tokyo, Japan |
| 16.00-16.15 | Kampo: ours, or theirs? A model for disentangling Japanese Kampo Medicine from Traditional Chinese Medicine G. De Soriano, Oxford, United Kingdom |
| 16.15-16.45 | Panel discussion Session C |
| 17.00-18.00 | General Meeting of the International Society for Japanese Kampo Medicine (ISJKM) |